I'm Not A Pervert!

The only reason homo sapien leaped in evolution and survive to this day is mating instincts. OK, and meat(protein) We are programmed to seek young, healthy females from first ovulation. Look within any tribes, that still exist, untouched by modern society and this holds true.

Ancient Greece,

Girls married when they were about 15. Marriages were arranged for them and often their husband was much older than them in

Roman Middle Ages,

In upper class families girls married as young as 12 and boys as young as 14

Inca c***dren,

Inca c***dren were treated harshly to toughen them. They were severely punished if they misbehaved.
At about the age of 10 the most beautiful girls were selected to be chosen women or Aqllakuna. They were taken from their families and sent to a house of chosen women or Aqllawasi. They were taught the Inca religion and skills like cooking and weaving. When they were about 14 some of the girls became priestesses or they married important Incas or even the Sapa Inca himself (the Sapa Inca often had hundreds of wives).
Girls left behind learned skills like cooking and weaving from their mothers. When they reached their teens they were old enough to marry.
Boys learned farming, fishing and other trades. Noble boys had tutors called Amataus who trained them to rule. When they reached the age of 14 boys were given a loincloth which symbolized the fact that they were now young men.


THOSE OF YOU WHO EAT SHIT/PISS, SHIT/PISS ON, FUCK SUCK OR BLOW a****lS; **** MAME OR HARM OTHERS; GET OFF ON MUTILATION, DEATH AND BEATINGS, JUDGE ONLY THYSELF. THAT GOES FOR ALL THE BIBLE THUMPIN, BLIND, CLOSE MINDED FOLLOWERS AS WELL.

58% (8/5)
 
Categories: First TimeTaboo
Posted by SURFERGURU
4 years ago    Views: 2,642
Comments (11)
Reply for:
Reply text
Please login or register to post comments.
TerrorGirl
retired
3 years ago
But all in all, its his opinion and he or she has the right it. Just saying.
TerrorGirl
retired
3 years ago
I'm liking the intellectual commentation on this post. But in my opinion, there are some morally indescribable things that some people are into. That's their thing. If the author of this post wants to rant about there being nothing wrong with being attracted to the young human body, then let them. I don't agree with his opinion but I respect it some. The human body is by human nature the most beautiful thing in the world, and I'm speaking from a artistic perspective on that point. I agree with him on mutilation and humiliation as being disgusting themes, but if a person is attracted to it, the so be it. We, as the viewing public, can suggest psychological screenings for the author or mental self improvement programs.
3 years ago
If this site bothers you that much sign off and leave our FANTASIES alone!!!!!!!!!!
4 years ago
????????????????? you lost me but that's ok am happy being lost.........
4 years ago
????????????????????????????????????????
schleppy
retired
4 years ago
I understand keithrbrts anger. This is a very sensitive issue. And I hear him wanting to protect minors. Such is admirable, and I have no doubt xHamster and everyone participating in the xHamster community stands with him in protecting minors (as well as adults) from sexual violence.

However, I don't hear the author arguing for pedophilia (i.e., attraction to prepubescent children) or, necessarily, for sex with minors. Rather, I hear the author feeling guilty (or ashamed) for finding postpubescents (i.e., mid to late teens) attractive.

To my mind, there's nothing necessarily abnormal about being physically attracted to young, fertile men or women (or both). They are, after all, physically capable of procreation. It would be rather unDarwinian, then if they were deemed physically unattractive. Besides, most of us have been attracted to mid to late teens, at some point in our lives. (Most often when we ourselves were that age.)

Therefore, I urge the author not to feel guilty or ashamed if a beautiful sixteen year old merely catches his or her eye. (And particularly if that sixteen year old is well-developed and looks older than sixteen). I suspect all that means is that the author is human.

Now, if the author also feels an emotional attraction to postpubecent youths, then that may well signal sexual dysfunction. If postpubescent youths are a frequent and exclusive "object" of attraction, then that too may well signal sexual dysfunction.

The author has admitted he or she is attracted to postpubescents. Does the author have a means to have sex with a postpubescent who is also a minor? Does the author have a plan to do so? Has the author established a time in which to carry out the plan? The more "yes's" the author answers with, the more I would urge the author to enter into psychotherapy. And if the author answers yes to the final question, then I would strong urge him or her to voluntarily commit him or herself to psychiatric hospitalization for twenty-four hours.

No one here is arguing that laws forbidding sex with minors be broken.
schleppy
retired
4 years ago
What can I say? I'm an intellectual. (Can you imagine Gianna Michaels flicking her bean while reading Alfred North Whitehead? Now *that's* wank worthy!)
4 years ago
schleppy is right but i do have to agree with your last statement about the bible thumpers and i do want to say this if you are atracted to young women then you should go to mexico thier marige age is twleve
4 years ago
wow, fucking deep or what? this is supposed to be a site for wanking over normal porn, not debating the social inadequacies of our current social climate. get a grip...
schleppy
retired
4 years ago
The mere historicity of a cross-cultural practice does not necessarily make it persuasive--let alone conscionable. For example, few would embrace a return to infanticide, simply because it was widely practiced in antiquity.

Furthermore, human sexuality is, in many ways, socially conditioned, and it is certainly prescribed within the boundaries of a society's taboos, mores, and laws. However, that critique does not necessarily invalidate that conditioning or those taboos, mores, and laws. Very often historical conditions precipitate the social construction of those conditions. So, for example, in antiquity the average life expectancy might have been 30 years. Perhaps 40 for the more healthy and wealthy. In such a society, it would be quite necessary for youths to be married and begin having children as soon as they were biologically able--so that they would have adult children who could take care of them, in their old age. So, we see social constructions are not imposed from outside a society, over and against biological "programming," but very often are the reasonable product of the actual conditions (social and biological) of that society.

Finally, to be aroused by postpubescent youth is not unnatural. Such an individual is, as you say, biologically fertile. It is understandable then that they would be considered attractive. I don't believe our (i.e., U.S.) society forbids feeling desire for postpubescent youths; rather, it forbids having sex with postpubescent youths. Therefore, feel no guilt in finding a young woman or young man attractive.
4 years ago
???????????????