Ultimate Tranny cumshots
304,185 98%
11 years ago
,jpeg/005/862/514/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/016/956/880/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/019/927/454/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/000/253/248/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/022/058/035/v2/320x180.258.jpg)
,jpeg/002/515/769/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/012/705/860/v2/320x180.267.jpg)
,jpeg/006/007/932/v2/320x180.224.jpg)
,jpeg/018/615/813/v2/320x180.222.jpg)
,jpeg/016/143/879/v2/320x180.276.jpg)
,jpeg/002/882/866/1280x720.2.jpg)
Comments
24
Don't you guys just "love" it when the camera handler has the PERFECT shot, and by PERFECT I mean,-- breasts, she-cock, and pretty FEMININE face are all in full view, -- and right at the moment of truth he zooms in removing breasts, and the pretty FEMININE face from the shot just to maneuver an EXTREME, UNESSARRY CLOSE UP of an enormous she-cock spewing its sweet creamy contents we could have already CLEARLY saw before he zoomed-in? No, we don't "love" it. As a matter of fact, we find it oddly absurd.,-- as in WDF absurd. Why do that when you had the PERFECT shot all along? NEVER exclude the HOT SEXY FACIAL EXPRESSIONS OF A T-GIRL WHEN SHE'S EJACULATING JUST TO GET AN UNNECESSARY SHOT OF HER HUMONGOUS COCK THAT CAN BE EASILY SPOTTED FROM OUTER SPACE. When this happens the audience is left with a mere (man) busting a nut. This is fine if your primary audience consists of gay men. However, the problem is that gay men are mostly into MEN, not transgender females or anyone who remotely resembles a girl.
